• RSS
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Linkedin
Home > Exception Handling > Error Handling In Class Library

Error Handling In Class Library


VB Copy Class FileRead Sub Open() Dim stream As FileStream = File.Open("myfile.txt", FileMode.Open) Dim b As Byte ' ReadByte returns -1 at end of file. Result codes consistently used may in theory be as good as exceptions (if much more tedious and error prone), but since the framework already uses exceptions, it would be incredibly confusing the application layer, the persistence layer, the network layer, the database layer, etc.) A "library" is a layer of functionality which has been distanced from your code by having been moved In C you check the input parameters and find one parameter to be invalid. have a peek at these guys

Has she came or Did She came When should I refuel my vehicle? This is the best way to preserve the exception call stack.The following code example shows a method that can throw an exception. Consider this when deciding where to throw an exception. Quite possibly the third as well - ideally, have centralized error handling. (Look into MVC configuration for that.) –Jon Skeet Mar 24 '15 at 11:22 add a comment| up vote 1

Exception Handling C#

Do nothing at all if it is an intranet, users will know how to find the guy that takes care of the web server. Exceptions need to be handled close to the code that throws the exception, only way you can know how to recover from the mishap. As programs become bigger and more complicated, this approach to that kind of error handling creates more and more insomniacs in the computer programmer profession.

  • Solution 1 Accept Solution Reject Solution If you want the exception in the calling code, you should really just throw the exception.
  • How do you guys handle error's from class libraries?
  • This is not a duplicate because my question here is not whether or not I should REDUCE the use of exception throw.

You use a try ... share|improve this answer edited Dec 1 '15 at 19:02 answered Dec 1 '15 at 18:22 JacquesB 20.6k95057 Not always, only in public functions. Thanks for the post, Andre Nov 17 '05 #14 P: n/a ahaupt Hi Chris, Thanks for the little InnerException tip. .net Exception Handling Framework Please explain what is wrong with my proof by contradiction.

I was jumping to fast to the conclusion without checking - my mistake. -- ------------- Frode "Jon Skeet [C# MVP]" wrote: Frode wrote: is a much better object-oritented (and cleaner) .net Exception Handling Best Practices This discussion have been beaten to death, but suffice to say that the framework have made the choice for you. All code inside the finally block will be executed no-matter-what before the call is returned to the caller. It should be up to the developer who uses your library how to deal with exceptions.

Nov 17 '05 #16 P: n/a Jon Skeet [C# MVP] wrote: Would it not be a good design to provide a way for the client to "plug-in" some functionality into C# Catch Exception In Class Library The Exception class has a number of useful properties and methods. Each calling application can then handle the exception based on it's specific needs. You need to catch exceptions on a very top stack frame of each thread.

.net Exception Handling Best Practices

Depends on whether this is a public facing web site or used internally, like a company's intranet. You can also trap this error higher up in your architecture layer if you want to. Exception Handling C# For example, a File.Open command returns a null reference if the file is not found, but throws an exception if the file is locked. Exception Handling Definition This article introduces you to error handling in C# and offers examples on how to use it.

There are cases when handling errors in applications is acceptable, but such cases are rare.An application should not handle exceptions that can result in an unexpected or exploitable state. More about the author Yeah I use try and catch for handling the errors at the moment. Lets say you have one client-exe (A) and two class libraries (B,C) button_click in A calls a method in B which uses a method in C. what will go in Catch block? Exception Handling Framework C#

If you want to do that, you can put it here, in the comments. –Robert Harvey Dec 1 '15 at 19:44 | show 11 more comments 2 Answers 2 active oldest Understand that English isn't everyone's first language so be lenient of bad spelling and grammar. For example if I were you, I will handle the exception at exact point where I want to show the message to user. check my blog Thanks, Andre Frode wrote: Throw an exception whenever an error occurs that your component (class library in this case) can't handle.

A positive integer gets reduced by 9 times when one of its digits is deleted.... Exception Handling Java Best Practices If you have a more specific question, you should update and clarify your question. –JacquesB Dec 2 '15 at 7:31 | show 5 more comments up vote 0 down vote Software In the following code example, a FileStream class exposes another way of determining if the end of the file has been reached to avoid the exception that will be thrown if

There might, however, be performance gains in not performing argument checking.

share|improve this answer answered Dec 1 '15 at 18:56 Mike Nakis 23k34187 Thanks for the answer... Nov 17 '05 #5 P: n/a Jeff Louie Also if the client violates an explicitly stated precondition of a framework method, I would throw an exception in the call. However, this is not the usual and not the most recommended way. Exception Handling Javatpoint Standard Exception Types The following table lists the standard exceptions provided by the runtime and the conditions for which you should create a derived class.

Use the exception builder methods. Code - namespace MvcProject.Controllers { public class HomeController : Controller { public ActionResult DoSomething() { try { Logger.CreateLog("some text."); } catch (Exception Ex) { //Exception is handled here. } return View(); It's quick & easy. Include extra information (other than the description string) in an exception only when there is a programmatic scenario where that additional information is useful.

Im sure you will understand the mechanism really soon. you can do variations of the catch statement, like "only catch a specific type of exception", or catch all exceptions. In some cases you want clean-up code to dispose objects etc when an exception is thrown. May I do it like this : public bool Rename(string newName,out Exception exception) { if (!this._parameters.Database.Equals(this.Database.Name)) this._parameters.SelectDatabase(this.Database.Name); try { if (string.IsNullOrEmpty(newName)) throw new ArgumentException("Invalid new table name (NULL or empty).");

The issue is that I find it quite clumsy getting that error back to the client. Nov 17 '05 #10 P: n/a Frode > is a much better object-oritented (and cleaner) approach. You can create your own by subclassing Exception or one of its derivates. more hot questions question feed lang-cs about us tour help blog chat data legal privacy policy work here advertising info mobile contact us feedback Technology Life / Arts Culture / Recreation

Similar topics error C2061: syntax error : identifier Handle Classes: The Smart Pointer Handle Class Error creating window handle Problems with Serial Comm Handle What is the proper way to handle I'm more interested in the "bubble up" process. try { throw new Exception("Doh!"); } finally { CleanUpCode(); // Will always be executed immediatly after // the error is thrown. } I would strongly recommend MSDN. C#C++VB Copy public void MethodWithBadCatch(Object anObject) { try { DoWork(anObject); } catch (ArgumentNullException e) { System.Diagnostics.Debug.Write(e.Message); // This is wrong.

Add a Solution Add your solution here B I U S small BIG code Plain TextC++CSSC#Delphi / PascalF#HTML / XML / ASPJavaJavascriptObjective-CSQLPerlPHPPythonVBXMLvar < > & link [^] encode untab case indent This is totally wrong. If I use that in all the methods, does it have any performance impact? Is that your intention? –supercat Apr 18 '13 at 22:08 4 And if you do decide to rethrow it, use just throw;.

But remember to place the most specific (specialized) exceptions in the first catch blocks...if you place Exception first, Application and Argument -exception won't be caught(!!) hmm..bad english...Application and Argument exceptions will Regards, Jeff *** Sent via Developersdex *** Nov 17 '05 #6 P: n/a Jon Skeet [C# MVP] wrote: Thanks for the reply.