• RSS
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Linkedin
Home > Sql Server > Error Handling In Sql Server 2008 Stored Procedures

Error Handling In Sql Server 2008 Stored Procedures


There are situations when checking @@error is unnecessary, or even meaningless. ERROR_MESSAGE. If you PRINT out XACT_STATE() in the CATCH block it is set to -1. The reason I prefer to have SET XACT_ABORT, NOCOUNT ON before BEGIN TRY is that I see this as one line of noise: it should always be there, but that I have a peek at these guys

Neither do I consider distributed transactions, nor situations where you use SAVE TRANSACTION. If the UPDATE statement runs successfully, the SalesLastYear value is updated and the operation is completed, in which case, the code in the CATCH block is never executed. The same rational applies to the ROLLBACK TRANSACTION on the Catch block. This is sometimes used by the system to return more information about the error.

Sql Stored Procedure Try Catch

Errors with COMMIT are so unexpected, that if they occur we have very little idea of what is going on, why the best is to leave here and now. CREATE PROCEDURE error_test_demo @mode char(1) AS CREATE TABLE #temp (...) DECLARE @err int, ... I cannot recall that I ever had any real use for it, though.) Formatting. He might have some error-handling code where he logs the error in a table.

View all articles by Robert Sheldon Related articles Also in BI Relational Algebra and its implications for NoSQL databases With the rise of NoSQL databases that are exploiting aspects of SQL There are many reasons. EXEC anyway though. Sql Server 2005 Stored Procedures I don't think there are many places in our application that the caller would actually look at it.

In this case, there should be only one (if an error occurs), so I roll back that transaction. Try Catch In Sql Server 2008 Stored Procedure Example End of Part One This is the end of Part One of this series of articles. Alternatively, the stored procedures or triggers can contain their own TRY…CATCH constructs to handle errors generated by their code. Even if you can write error checking without any local variable, you would still have need for it as soon you want to do something "fancy", so you better always use

This is not documented in Books Online, and it makes me a little nervous that there might be more errors that SET XACT_ABORT ON does not affect. Sql Server 2000 Stored Procedures We can use this to reraise a complete message that retains all the original information, albeit with a different format. Anonymous-Dave House (not signed in) Parameters Too bad Microsoft neglected to include the parameters that were passed into the stored procedure in the throw error structure. I think that will work.

  1. Getting the Return Value from a Stored Procedure Acknowledgements and Feedback Revision History Introduction Error handling in stored procedures is a very tedious task, because T-SQL offers no exception mechanism,
  2. This is when you basically have nowhere to go with the error.
  3. Take what I present in this article as recommendations.

Try Catch In Sql Server 2008 Stored Procedure Example

Now let's execute the stored procedure again, once more trying to deduct $4 million from the sales amount, as shown in Listing 11. 1 EXEC UpdateSales 288, -4000000; Listing 11: Causing Here is an outline of such a procedure may look like: CREATE PROCEDURE error_demo_cursor AS DECLARE @err int, ... Sql Stored Procedure Try Catch I personally thought that was one of the best uses of catch block in stored procedures. Sql Server Error Handling Nested Stored Procedures More importantly, if you leave out the semicolon before THROW this does not result in a syntax error, but in a run-time behaviour which is mysterious for the uninitiated.

IF (XACT_STATE()) = 1 BEGIN PRINT N'The transaction is committable.' + 'Committing transaction.' COMMIT TRANSACTION; END; END CATCH; GO Examples: Azure SQL Data Warehouse and Parallel Data WarehouseD. If you know another way to get the return value from a dynamic stored procedure call, I would love to know. –Gordon Linoff Feb 6 '13 at 21:20 Well This is where the careful use or the RETURN statement comes in: If you get a non-zero value back from a stored procedure, this indicates that an error occurred in that Listing 12: The error message returned by the UpdateSales stored procedure As you can see, SQL Server 2012 makes handling errors easier than ever. How To Handle Exception In Stored Procedure Sql Server 2008

How to create a plot with inclined axes? Hot Network Questions Tenant claims they paid rent in cash and that it was stolen from a mailbox. He is now a technical consultant and the author of numerous books, articles, and training material related to Microsoft Windows, various relational database management systems, and business intelligence design and implementation. SQL2005 offers significantly improved methods for error handling with TRY-CATCH.

The part between BEGIN TRY and END TRY is the main meat of the procedure. Sql Server Express Stored Procedures Browse other questions tagged sql-server sql-server-2008 or ask your own question. The functions return error-related information that you can reference in your T-SQL statements.

You can just as easily come up with your own table and use in the examples.

The success path is fine. Final Remarks You have now learnt a general pattern for error and transaction handling in stored procedures. However, what I want to do is to handle the error and return a nice value. Sql Server 2008 Triggers In this case it would be best to check @@error and set return status after the SELECT.

The final RETURN statement is a safeguard. I start by using the @@TRANCOUNT function to determine whether any transactions are still open. @@TRANCOUNT is a built-in SQL Server function that returns the number of running transactions in the Yes No Additional feedback? 1500 characters remaining Submit Skip this Thank you! news They are not in the scope for this article, since I am restricting myself to application development.

ROLLBACK or not to ROLLBACK - That's the Question SET XACT_ABORT ON revisited Error Handling with Cursors Error Handling with Triggers Error Handling with User-Defined Functions Error Handling with Dynamic SQL This line is the only line to come before BEGIN TRY. Avoid unnecessary error messages. If you like this article you can sign up for our weekly newsletter.

Errno ' + ltrim(str(@errno)) + ': ' + @errmsg The purpose of this SELECT statement is to format an error message that we pass to RAISERROR, and which includes all information That's basically all you need to do to create a stored procedure that contains a TRY…CATCH block. All comments are reviewed, so stay on subject or we may delete your comment. If the error was generated inside a stored procedure this will hold the name of the procedure.

DELETE FROM Production.Product WHERE ProductID = 980; END TRY BEGIN CATCH SELECT ERROR_NUMBER() AS ErrorNumber ,ERROR_SEVERITY() AS ErrorSeverity ,ERROR_STATE() AS ErrorState ,ERROR_PROCEDURE() AS ErrorProcedure ,ERROR_LINE() AS ErrorLine ,ERROR_MESSAGE() AS ErrorMessage; IF In those days, the best we could do was to look at return values. In listing 8, I run the procedure once again, but this time specify -4000000 for the amount. 1 EXEC UpdateSales 288, -4000000; Listing 8: Causing the UpdateSales stored procedure to throw For starters, where to you put the check of @@error? (You put it where execution would end up if the condition does not yield a true value.

DELETE FROM Production.Product WHERE ProductID = 980; -- If the DELETE statement succeeds, commit the transaction. In actually, I need only to roll back the transaction and specify the THROW statement, without any parameters. This may seem inconsistent, but for the moment take this a fact. Probability that 3 points in a plane form a triangle How do I make my test code DRY?

As i was unaware of using exception handling concept in stored procedure. But notice that the actual error number (547) is different from the RAISERROR message number (50000) and that the actual line number (9) is different from the RAISERROR line number (27). And in theory they are right, but this is how SQL Server works. (And there is no reason to feel stupid if you held this belief. These are the statements for which I recommend you to always check @@error: DML statements, that is, INSERT, DELETE and UPDATE, even when they affect temp tables or table variables.